Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measures Research Articles

Can prediction models for hospital readmission be improved by incorporating patient-reported outcome measures? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

To investigate the roles, challenges, and implications of using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in predicting the risk of hospital readmissions. We systematically searched four bibliometric databases for peer-reviewed studies published in English between 1 January 2000 and 15 June 2023 and used validated PROMs to predict readmission risks for adult populations. Reported studies were analysed and narratively synthesised in accordance with the CHARMS and PRISMA guidelines. Of the 2858 abstracts reviewed, 23 studies met predefined eligibility criteria, representing diverse geographic regions and medical specialties. Among those, 19 identified the positive contributions of PROMs in predicting readmission risks. Seven studies utilised generic PROMs exclusively, eleven used generic and condition-specific PROMs, while 5 focussed solely on condition-specific PROMs. Logistic regression was the most used modelling approach, with 13 studies aiming at predicting 30-day all-cause readmission risks. The c-statistic, ranging from 0.54 to 0.84, was reported in 22/23 studies as a measure of model discrimination. Nine studies reported model calibration in addition to c-statistic. Thirteen studies detailed their approaches to dealing with missing data. Our study highlights the potential of PROMs to enhance predictive accuracy in readmission models, while acknowledging the diversity in data collection methods, readmission definitions, and model evaluation approaches. Recognizing that PROMs serve various purposes beyond readmission reduction, our study supports routine data collection and strategic integration of PROMs in healthcare practices to improve patient outcomes. To facilitate comparative analysis and broaden the use of PROMs in the prediction framework, it is imperative to consider the methodological aspects involved.

The state of art on the use of patient reported outcomes in migraine.

This review aims to explore the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in migraine. Traditionally assessed through specific features, recent adoption of PROMs allows for a more objective and quantifiable evaluation. PROMs, which are standardized questionnaires collecting health information directly from a patients' perspective, cover various aspects, including migraine specific aspects. The review focuses on delineating the applications and interpretation of commonly used PROMs in migraine research, with an emphasis on their integration in clinical care. Generic and migraine-specific PROMs play a crucial role in clinical research, particularly in assessing health-related quality of life, disability, impact, and associated comorbidities. Some of these measures are strongly recommended to be used by the International Guidelines and are, in fact, mandated by the FDA for product labeling. Recently, there has been an expansion in the use of PROMs to assess migraine in diverse populations, in particular pediatric patients. However, the application of these measures in clinical care shows considerable heterogeneity, and some have not been validated specifically for migraine. The existing multitude of PROMs, coupled with ongoing development of new ones to better capture patient concerns, creates complexity in their research and clinical application. To address these challenges, it becomes imperative to streamline their use, focusing on those that are more validated and better aligned with the patients' perspective including different populations' needs. The utilization of PROMs in evaluating migraine enables a more holistic assessment, helps quantify the impact of the disease facilitating change measurement, improves communication between healthcare providers and patients and, guides treatment decisions for improved outcomes. However, the increasing number of PROMs questionnaires, underscores the importance of validating these tools for migraine and, the dynamic nature of the disease makes it relevant to decide with whom, why and when these should be used.

Hip-specific and generic patient-reported outcome measure scores after primary hip replacement are associated with early revision surgery: a national registry study

BackgroundThe ability to efficiently identify patients at higher risk of poor outcomes after joint replacement would enable limited resources for post-operative follow-up to be directed to those with the greatest clinical need. This is particularly important as joint replacement rates continue to grow internationally, stretching health system capabilities. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are routinely administered in many settings and offer an opportunity to detect suboptimal patient outcomes early. This study aimed to determine whether hip-specific and generic PROM scores are associated with early revision hip replacement within six to 24 months after the primary procedure.MethodsPre-operative and six-month post-operative PROM scores for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement (THR) were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry and Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes Registry National and linked to revision surgery data. Clinically important improvement was defined using anchor-based thresholds. Associations between PROM scores (hip pain, Oxford Hip Score, HOOS-12, EQ-5D-5L, EQ VAS, patient-perceived change, satisfaction) and revision surgery were evaluated using t-tests, chi-square tests and regression models.ResultsData were analysed for 21,236 primary THR procedures between 2013 and 2022. Eighty-eight revision procedures were performed at six to 24 months. Patients who were revised had more back pain and worse HOOS-12 scores pre-operatively but between-group differences were small. Worse post-operative PROM scores (hip pain, Oxford, HOOS-12, EQ-5D-5L, EQ VAS) were associated with early revision, after adjusting for age and sex (p < 0.001 for all analyses). Patient dissatisfaction (relative risk (RR) 10.18, 95%CI 6.01–17.25) and patient-perceived worsening (RR 19.62, 95%CI 11.33–33.98) were also associated with a higher likelihood of revision. Patients who did not achieve clinically important improvement in hip pain, function, or quality of life had a higher revision risk (RRs 2.54–5.64), compared with those who did (reference).ConclusionSix-month hip-specific and generic PROM scores can identify patients at higher risk of early revision surgery. Our data highlight the utility of routine post-operative PROM assessment for signaling suboptimal surgical outcomes.

Systematic review of the patient burden of generalised myasthenia gravis in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa

BackgroundMyasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by muscle weakness, and progression from ocular (oMG) to generalised (gMG) symptoms results in a substantial negative impact on quality of life (QoL). This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the patient burden experienced by people living with gMG.MethodsElectronic database searches (conducted March 2022), supplemented by interrogation of grey literature, were conducted to identify studies reporting patient burden outcomes in patients with gMG in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Results were synthesised narratively due to the heterogeneity across trials.ResultsIn total, 39 patient burden publications (representing 38 unique studies) were identified as relevant for inclusion in the systematic review, consisting of 37 publications reporting formal patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and two publications describing alternative qualitative assessments of patient experience. The studies included a variety of measures including generic and disease-specific PROMs, as well as symptom-specific PROMs focusing on key comorbidities including depression, anxiety, fatigue and sleep disturbance. The findings showed some variation across studies and PROMs; however, in general there was evidence for worse QoL in patients with gMG than in healthy controls or in patients with oMG, and a trend for worsening QoL with increasing MG severity.ConclusionsThis review highlights the importance of considering patient QoL when developing and assessing treatment and management plans for patients with gMG. However, the heterogeneity identified across studies illustrates the need for further representative and well-powered studies in large cohorts administering consistent, validated questionnaires.Trial registrationThe protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42022328444.

A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis.

ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV) is associated with significant morbidity, fatigue, pain and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This review aims to assess the comprehensiveness of existing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in AAV and identify associations with poorer HRQoL outcomes. A literature review of studies using PROMs, including those labelled HRQoL in people with AAV as a primary or secondary study outcome were screened and reviewed up to July 2023. Quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. A total of 30 articles were included which utilised 22 different PROM tools. 76.7% (n = 23) used the SF-36 or a variation as a generic measure of health status and or HRQoL. Two studies developed a disease specific PROM. The AAV-PRO showed good psychometric properties but potential limitations in capturing all relevant aspects of the disease experience for AAV patients. Factors associated with poorer HRQoL included: neurological and sinonasal involvement, women and younger patients. 86.6% of studies showed no meaningful relationships between the SF-36 and BVAS, VDI or disease duration. Depression and anxiety were common and socioeconomic factors such as unemployment were significantly associated with poorer mental health outcomes. Glucocorticoids were found to be independently associated with worse SF-36 scores. Generic PROMs are useful in measuring significant changes but lack sensitivity to specific symptoms and unique AAV-related issues, while existing disease specific PROMs have limitations and may not fully capture AAV patient's perspective on disease and treatment burden.

Chronic cough: more than just a persistent cough: a systematic literature review to understand the impact of chronic cough on quality of life.

Chronic cough (CC), defined as a cough persisting ≥ 8weeks, can have a substantial negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This is exacerbated by challenges with timely diagnosis and a lack of approved therapies. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify evidence on HRQoL and health state utility values associated with refractory CC or unexplained CC. Electronic database searches were supplemented with searches of conference proceedings and health technology assessment body websites. Two independent reviewers assessed all citations for inclusion based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Key inclusion criteria were patient populations with CC and reporting of patient-reported outcomes or utilities using generic or disease-specific measures. Following screening, 65 studies were identified for inclusion in the SLR. Of these, 23 studies assessed HRQoL among patients with CC who were not treated or treated with unspecified interventions, and 42 studies in patients who were treated with specified interventions. The studies indicated a substantial decrement to HRQoL as a result of CC, characterized by generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures. HRQoL was impacted across multiple domains, including physical, psychological, and social functioning. The studies also demonstrated the potential for treatments to have a significant positive impact on HRQoL. CC can substantially affect HRQoL in patients, across physical, psychological, and social domains. Although treatments can improve HRQoL in these patients, the available evidence is limited. There remains an unmet need for approved pharmacological treatments to alleviate CC and improve HRQoL for these patients.

Can a generic patient reported outcome measure substitute a condition specific measure at assessing care effectiveness in low back pain?

Quality of care assessments beside the provider level should also include the patient perspective, however, there aren't widespread solutions for this approach. One possibility is to apply a generic, thus, widely applicable Patient Reported Outcomes Measure (PROM) to assess care outcomes. Taking this notion into consideration, this study aimed to investigate if a generic questionnaire can reliably substitute a disease-specific questionnaire when measuring care effectiveness with patient-reported outcome measures among patients with low back pain. Between January and December 2019, we conducted a before and after survey in three Hungarian hospitals. Adults with confirmed low back pain expecting spinal surgery were eligible to enter the study. SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) and Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were used. Multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between the results of the two questionnaires and how service provider, sex, and education level could explain the differences in the calculated PROM-based performance measures. During the pre-intervention survey, 11 individuals decided to either not sign the consent form or complete the questionnaire. As a result, 116 individuals participated in the first – baseline – survey and 86 in the second – follow-up – survey. The drop-out rate varied by providers: the lowest rate was 15%, and the highest 39%. Of the SF-36 subscale-based performance measures, role limitations due to physical health and physical functioning significantly correlated with the RMDQ performance measure. Considering the necessary minimum clinically important difference, the explanatory analysis showed that the SF-36 physical functioning subscale-based and the RMDQ-based performance measures established the same performance rank-order among the participating hospitals. The physical functioning subscale of the SF-36 provided similar results to the RMDQ regarding care effectiveness. Thus, the SF-36 may be able to measure and compare care effectiveness among providers in low-back pain. If future studies investigating other health conditions come to the same conclusion, then the SF-36 could be used by itself to incorporate the patient perspective into health care quality assessments, thereby increasing comparability and lowering administrative costs.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between total hip replacement and total knee replacement.

Total hip replacements (THR) and total knee replacements (TKR) are effective treatments for severe osteoarthritis (OA). Some studies suggest clinical outcomes following THR are superior to TKR, the reason for which remains unknown. This study compares clinical outcomes between THR and TKR. To compare the clinic outcomes of THR anad TKR using a comprehensive range of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). A prospective longitudinal observational study of patients with OA undergoing THR and TKR were evaluated using a comprehensive range of generic and joint specific PROMs pre- and post-operatively. A total of 131 patients were included in the study which comprised the THR group (68 patients) and the TKR group (63 patients). Both groups demonstrated significant post-operative improvements in all PROM scores (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in post-operative PROM scores between the two groups: Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome scores (P = 0.140), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain (P = 0.297) stiffness (P = 0.309) and function (P = 0.945), Oxford Hip and Knee Score (P = 0.076), EuroQol-5D index (P = 0.386) and Short-Form 12-item survey physical component score (P = 0.106). Subgroup analyses showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilised prostheses in the TKR group and no significant difference (P > 0.05) between cemented and uncemented fixation in the THR group. Obese patients had poorer outcomes following TKR but did not significantly influence the outcome following THR. Contrary to some literature, THR and TKR are equally efficacious in alleviating the pain and disability of OA when assessed using a comprehensive range of PROMs. The varying knee prosthesis types and hip fixation techniques did not significantly influence clinical outcome. Obesity had a greater influence on the outcome following TKR than that of THR.

Are disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) used in cardiogenetics? A systematic review

AbstractPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to facilitate patient-centered care (PCC). While studies in patients with cardiac conditions have revealed poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and elevated emotional stress, studies in inherited cardiac conditions (ICC) seem rare. A systematic review evaluated which (specific domains of) PROMs are used in patients with ICC. From three databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, and Web of Science) quantitative studies investigating PROMs in patients with ICC were included. A Cochrane-based assessment tool was used to evaluate quality and potential risk of bias per subdomain. Data from 17 eligible articles were extracted. Among the included studies, risk of bias was predominantly high (35%) or unclear (30%). Most (n = 14) studies used a generic health status measure (SF-36, SF-12); 3 studies used a disease-specific PROM (KCCQ- cardiomyopathy and MLFHQ-heart failure). In addition to HRQoL measures, several studies used affective psychological measures (i.e., HADS, CAQ-18, IES-R, and IPQ). The mental health component of the PROMs showed lower scores overall in patients with ICC compared to population norms. Nine studies using HADS and GAD-7/PHQ-9 showed a prevalence of clinically significant anxiety (17–47%) and depression levels (8.3–28%) that were higher than the population norm (8.3% and 6.3%, respectively). HRQoL in patients with ICC is primarily assessed with generic PROMs. Results further confirmed high psychological morbidity in this population. Generic PROMS measures evaluate overall health status, but lack sensitivity to ICC-specific factors like heredity-related concerns. We propose developing a PROM specific for ICC to optimize PCC.

Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and 36-Item Short Form Survey Ten Years Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) refers to a cutoff value on any patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) scale, beyond which patients consider themselves as having achieved an acceptable outcome. This study aimed to identify PASS thresholds for knee-specific and generic PROMs at 10 years post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). MethodsThere were 269 patients who underwent UKA for medial osteoarthritis from 2004 to 2007 at a single institution and were surveyed preoperatively and 10 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Score (MCS), and SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS). Treatment outcomes and expectations were assessed using an anchor question, and PASS attainment was determined using the Youden index on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Also, a similar study that identified 2-year long-term PROM PASS thresholds for UKA was referenced and compared. ResultsOverall, 91.1% reported acceptable outcomes. The area under the curve for ROCs of KSKS, OKS, and PCS were 0.80, 0.75, and 0.71, respectively. The area under the curve for ROCs of KSFS and MCS were both 0.64. The PASS thresholds were 67.5 for KSFS, 70.5 for KSKS, 39.5 for OKS, 44.6 for PCS, and 43.8 for MCS. Patients who achieved a PASS were at least 3 times more likely to have satisfactory outcomes. ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study that identified 10-year long-term PROM PASS thresholds for UKA. Accounting for our finding that a decade-long follow-up yielded lower PASS thresholds, time-specific UKA PROM PASS thresholds should be considered. Level of evidenceIII.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Current Challenges, and Ways Forward.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects >1.2 million Americans annually. Although the clinical outcomes and economic burdens of VTE have been well described, the impact of VTE on patients' health status has yet to be summarized. This systematic review summarizes how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been used in VTE to date. PubMed/MEDLINE was queried for literature published through March 2023 using PROMs in a population of patients with VTE. Studies were excluded if the reference was an editorial, review, or case report, or if the study included patients with conditions other than VTE. Qualitative analyses were performed. After screening and exclusion, 136 references were identified; 5 described PROM development, 20 focused on PROM validation, and 111 used PROMs in outcomes research. The most used generic PROMs were the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey and EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire, and the most common disease-specific PROMs were the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life/Symptoms and the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire. PROMs were used to quantify the changes in health status after diagnosis, characterize the trajectory of subsequent improvement, and identify drivers of continued impairments in health status like postthrombotic syndrome and postpulmonary embolism syndrome. PROMs were also used to investigate the impact of novel treatment modalities on quality of life. This review demonstrates the many benefits of PROM use, including quantifying changes in health status with treatment, capturing patients' experiences with the treatment itself, and identifying complications of VTE. Incorporating PROMs into VTE care will be an essential component of evaluating the effectiveness of novel therapies and should lead to improved shared decision-making for patients with VTE.

A Swiss digital Delphi study on patient-reported outcomes.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators are patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PROs are defined as any report of the status of a patient's health condition or health behaviour that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else. Despite Swiss national bodies (FOPH, FMH) recognising the potential of PRO measures (PROMs) for improving the health system, no consensus has yet emerged regarding a generic PROM framework or specific domains for practical uptake. The aim of the present digital Delphi study was to generate a consensual Swiss expert opinion on a generic PROM framework, measurement domains and items from a validated instrument (PROMIS [Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System]) as well as on the role and implementation of PROs in the Swiss healthcare system via PRO consensus statements. A 4-round digital Delphi study was conducted among Swiss PRO stakeholders. A total of n = 21 Swiss PROM stakeholders completed round 1 surveys on the PROM framework. During the stakeholder meeting, n = 11 stakeholders completed round 2 and round 3 surveys pertaining to measurement domains and items, respectively. In-meeting key questions and discussion items were extracted, consolidated into statements and subjected to consensus voting in a round 4, post-meeting survey. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement. Pre-meeting, agreement was reached for the tripartite framework of physical, mental and social health (95-100%). During the meeting, agreement was reached on all seven measurement domains of a generic PROM (PROMIS-29), ranging from 80% (Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance) to 100% (Pain Interference, Depression, Ability to Participate in Social Roles). Consensus was also reached for all PROMIS-29 items, with average domain consensus ranging from 83% (Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles) to 100% (Depression). Finally, four post-meeting consensus statements regarding PROs in Switzerland reached agreement. A Delphi method can help identify areas of need regarding PROMs in Switzerland. The current study identified a generic PROM as a missing quality indicator for the Swiss national health system's value. A pre-meeting informational briefing, expert presentations and moderation supported three voting rounds to help identify PROMIS-29 as a PROM framework (round 1), measurement domains (round 2) and items (round 3) as a basis for further validation research. The empirical agreement among diverse stakeholders supports broad consensus towards preliminary feasibility of integrating generic PROMs into the Swiss health system based on content relevance.

Multimethod study on patient-reported measures for routine assessment of primary care

Abstract Objectives Health systems across the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) spend around 9% of their GDP on health, but we know surprisingly little about whether health systems are truly delivering the care people need. One solution is the routine collection of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient reported experience measures (PREMs), i.e. patients’ subjective health status and experiences of care. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether validated generic PROMs and PREMs measure criteria relevant to routine performance assessment of and monitoring in primary care. Methods This is a multimethod study. First, we collected qualitative data using the nominal group technique to identify the roles and tasks of primary care from the perspective of patients, providers, and decision-makers in healthcare. Second, we conducted a systematic literature search in EMBASE supplemented by a grey literature search to identify self-administered, validated, and generic PREMs and PROMs for adults used in primary care. Results The role of primary care is not limited to improving health, but also includes, for example, patient empowerment and support in navigating the healthcare system. Experiences of care and the supportive structure of primary care were rated as more important than health outcomes. Six of 14 questionnaires identified in the literature review address both PREMs and PROMs. PREMs largely focused on experiences with healthcare providers. Comparison of both data sources revealed a lack of PREMs addressing experiences with care structures. Conclusions The results suggest that care experiences are an outcome in their own right in primary care and should thus be considered in routine evaluation of primary healthcare services, which additionally allows pointing to quality improvements. Future questionnaires should address experiences with care structures and the relationship between care experience and health outcomes. Key messages • Alongside health outcomes, care experiences are a primary care outcome in their own right and should thus be considered in routine assessment. • Future routine assessment tools should address experiences with care structures and the relationship between care experiences and health outcomes.

Responsiveness of specific and generic patient-reported outcome measures in patients with plantar fasciopathy

Purpose To evaluate and compare responsiveness characteristics for the Foot Function Index revised short form (FFI-RS), RAND-12 Health Status Inventory (RAND-12), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), in patients with plantar fasciopathy receiving non-surgical treatment. Materials and methods This study was conducted on a sub-group of patients from an ongoing randomised controlled trial. One-hundred fifteen patients were included. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were applied at baseline and after 6 months. Responsiveness was calculated using standardised response mean and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. ROC curves were used to compute the minimal important change (MIC) for the outcome measures. Results The region specific FFI-RS had best responsiveness and the NRS at rest had lowest responsiveness. Conclusion FFI-RS were marginally more responsive than the other PROMs. Responsiveness and MIC estimates should be regarded as indicative rather than fixed estimates.

Development of an implementation strategy for routine collection of generic patient reported outcome measures: a qualitative study in multidisciplinary community rehabilitation

Purpose To explore staff perceptions of barriers and enablers towards implementing the EQ-5D-5L in community rehabilitation, and develop a theory-informed implementation approach for routine administration of generic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using implementation science frameworks. Materials and methods A qualitative study was conducted at three sites. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation staff completed individual semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and coded against the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We identified and selected potentially effective behaviour change techniques using the Behavior Change Wheel. Hypothetical strategies were operationalised. Results Twenty-one interviews were conducted, and four themes emerged: (1) The Impact of PROMs on patient centered-care; (2) Considerations for validity of PROMs; (3) Service-level impact of embedding PROMs; (4) Practical issues of embedding PROMs within the service. Barriers and enablers were mapped to seven of the TDF domains; relating most to clinicians’ “belief about consequences”, “reinforcement”, and “environmental context and resources”. Five hypothetical strategies were developed to overcome identified barriers and strengthen enablers. Key behaviour change techniques underpinning the strategies include: restructuring the physical environment, incentivisation, persuasion and education, enablement, and, social support. Conclusions Our implementation approach highlights the importance of automating processes, engaging site champions, routinely reporting, and using PROM data to inform service provision.

Health Status of US Patients With One or More Health Conditions: Using a Novel Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Producing Single Metric Measures.

Most existing research studying health status impacted by morbidity has focused on a specific health condition, and most instruments used for measuring health status are neither patient-centered nor preference-based. This study aims to report on the health status of patients impacted by one or more health conditions, measured by a patient-centered and preference-based electronic patient-reported outcome measure. A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with one or more health conditions in the United States. A novel generic, patient-centered, and preference-based electronic patient-reported outcome measure: Château Santé-Base, was used to measure health status. Individual health state was expressed as a single metric number (value). We compared these health-state values between sociodemographic subgroups, between separate conditions, between groups with or without comorbidity, and between different combinations of multimorbidity. The total sample comprised 3913 patients. Multimorbidity was present in 62% of the patients. The most prevalent health conditions were pain (50%), fatigue/sleep problems (40%), mental health problems (28%), respiratory diseases (22%), and diabetes (18%). The highest (best) and lowest health-state values were observed in patients with diabetes and mental health problems. Among combinations of multimorbidity, the lowest values were observed when mental health problems were involved, the second lowest values were observed when fatigue/sleep problems and respiratory diseases coexisted. This study compared health status across various single, and multiple (multimorbidity and comorbidity) health conditions directly, based on single metric health-state values. The insights are valuable in clinical practice and policy-making.

How is the patient perspective captured in ANCA-associated vasculitis research? An integrative review.

The aim was to describe how the patient perspective is captured in clinical research on ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). This integrative review included 2149 publications found in four different databases and manual searches. After screening, 156 articles remained. All articles were sorted and categorized, and 77 original articles were analysed further. The patient perspective was captured with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), single-item questionnaires, project-specific questionnaires and interviews. The most common aspects measured were health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression, and fatigue, and the least common were lifestyle habits, relationships and self-management. The patient perspective was captured predominantly with generic PROMs and occasionally with a qualitative approach. AVV is a lifelong disease, and the results from this review show that not all aspects of importance to patients are covered with the PROMs used in research. Future studies should include the areas that are the most important for patients.

Acceptability of the routine use and collection of a generic patient reported outcome measure from the perspective of healthcare staff: a qualitative study

BackgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a measure of self-perceived health status or health-related quality of life. They have been used to support provider-patient decisions, healthcare delivery, and value-based healthcare models. A barrier to routine collection of PROMs is the perception that PROMs lack clinical utility. As such, it is important to establish clinicians’ acceptability of the PROM prior to large-scale implementation. This study explored the acceptability of the routine use and collection of a generic PROM in healthcare services from the perspective of healthcare staff.MethodsIndividual semi-structured interviews were completed from September 2020 to March 2021 with 26 staff from two multi-disciplinary community healthcare services in Melbourne, Australia. Interviews explored their experiences of using the EQ-5D-5L in their routine care. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed according to a framework approach, using inductive and deductive techniques.ResultsParticipants discussed the acceptability of the EQ-5D-5L with reference to four themes: practicalities of use; holistic nature; influence on client care; and influence on health service. Participants found the EQ-5D-5L quick and easy to administer, and appreciated that it measured multiple domains of health that were relevant to their clients’ care. They believed the EQ-5D-5L helped to identify client problems, and inform service delivery. They also reported features that were less acceptable, including a lack of item specificity to some healthcare disciplines. Participants reported the challenge of managing conflict between their assessment of the client’s health and the client’s perspective of their own health, leading some to question whether the client could provide an accurate reflection of their own health.ConclusionsThe EQ-5D-5L has several features that healthcare staff viewed as acceptable for routine collection and use in healthcare. Training on the validity of the patient reported perspective and broadening the scope of PROMs collection beyond the EQ-5D-5L should be considered to facilitate large-scale implementation.

Development and validation of a novel personalized electronic patient-reported outcome measure to assess quality of life (Q-LIFE): a prospective observational study in people with Cystic Fibrosis

Generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may lack relevance and sensitivity on a patient-level in chronic diseases with differential disease expression and high individual variability, such as Cystic Fibrosis (CF). This study aimed to develop and validate a novel personalized electronic PROM (ePROM) that captures relevant aspects of quality of life in individuals with CF. The Q-Life app was developed as a short personalized ePROM to assess individual quality of life. Psychometric properties were assessed in a single-center cross-sectional study between September 2019 and September 2021 and in a prospective cohort study between September 2021 and September2022. Combined studies included 223 participants (median age: 24 years, IQR: 19.0-32.5 years, range: 12.0-58.0 years). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.83-0.90) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.65-0.92; p<0.001) of quality of life (Q-Life) scores were strong. Q-Life scores were associated with overall Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) scores (ρ=0.71; p<0.001), CFQ-R respiratory domain scores (ρ=0.57; p<0.001) and forced expiratory volume in 1s (ρ=0.41; p<0.001). Furthermore, Q-Life scores improved from 65.0 (IQR: 45.0-63.3) at baseline to 84.2 (IQR: 75.0-95.0) and 87.5 (IQR: 75.0-100.0) after 3 and 6 months of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor treatment (change: 20.8; 95% CI: 17.5-25.0; p<0.001), comparable to CFQ-R respiratory domain scores (change: 22.2, 95% CI: 19.4-25.0, p<0.001). The Q-Life app is a reliable, valid and sensitive personalized ePROM to measure all aspects of quality of life that really matter to individuals with Cystic Fibrosis. This patient-centered approach could provide important advantages over generic and disease-specific PROMs in the era of personalized medicine and value-based healthcare. Dutch Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Health-Holland.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Liver and Gastrointestinal Cancer Randomized Controlled Trials.

For many years, outcomes such as mortality and morbidity were the standard for evaluating oncological treatment effectiveness. With the introduction of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the focus shifted from a mere extension of a patient's life or release from disease to the improvement of a multilayered concept of health, decisively affecting life satisfaction. In this study, we deal with the topic of PROMs in liver and gastrointestinal randomized controlled trials. The final database included 43 papers reporting results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for liver or gastrointestinal cancer interventions where one of the primary or secondary outcomes was a health-related quality of life measure. The most often used PROM was the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) for both liver cancer and gastrointestinal cancer (in 62% of gastrointestinal cancer studies and 57% of liver cancer studies). For the gastrointestinal cancer group, the QLQ-STO22, a cancer-specific extension of the QLQ-C30, was the second most commonly used PROM. In liver cancer, the generic PROM Short Form 36 and the EORTC QLQ-HCC18, a cancer-specific extension of the QLQ-C30, were the second most commonly used PROMs. We found that RCTs often do not include comprehensive quality-of-life measures. When quality of life is part of an RCT, it is often only a secondary outcome. For a holistic view of the patient, a stronger integration and weighting of patient-reported outcomes in RCTs would be desirable.